Imagen 4 | An Honest AI Image Generator Review
Note: This Review is Non-Biased and Not Affiliated with Google Deepmind.
In this article, we will give you an in-depth breakdown of the AI Image Generator, Imagen 4.
Imagen 4 is a Google product from their Vertex AI platform, its images are clean, well-composed, and technically solid.
That said, the results lean heavily toward ultrapolished, corporate studio photography, with few moments of cinematic or artistic flair.
Maximum Resolution: Up to ~2048 × 2048 pixels (with multiple supported aspect ratios)
Upscaling: No native 4K upscale; external upscaling required for higher resolutions
Generation Speed: Fast, near-instant to a few seconds depending on deployment (with a dedicated “Fast” variant available)
Imagen 4 is an exceptionally stable model, earning perfect 10s in Prompt Adherence in all but five tests.
Drops in Visual Fidelity and Realism happen, but they fall into consistent, predictable categories, meaning once you understand the model’s limits, you’re able to work around them.
Imagen 4 - Benchmark Score (8.49/10)
In our Curious Refuge Labs™ review, Imagen 4 was scored across three categories: Prompt Adherence, Visual Fidelity, and Style & Realism. The average scores were:
Prompt Adherence: 9.7/10
Visual Fidelity: 7.9/10
Style & Realism: 7.8/10
Total Curious Refuge Labs™ Score: 8.49/10
Imagen 4 is an exceptionally stable model, scoring perfect 10s for Prompt Adherence in all but five tests. Dips in visual Fidelit and Style & Realism are pronounced, but once you undeersand the models limitations, you can manioulate it to get the most out of each prompt.
Imagen 4 | AI Image Expert Review
Below is a detailed review of how Imagen 4 performs against the categories listed above.
Prompt Adherence — 9.7/10
Across the benchmark, scoring a perfect 10 in adherence comes down to one dominant factor: opening your prompt with clear cinematic camera language.
Establish a shot, establish the frame, and you’re already halfway home. During testing, only five prompts dip below a perfect 10. Importantly, these dips aren’t random. They fall into two clear, repeatable categories.
The first category is prompts that open with stylistic or domain descriptors instead of camera grammar.
They all open with stylistic descriptions, dispensing with camera language entirely. This forces the model to decide what kind of image you want before it can decide how to render it, lowering adherence.
The second category is prompts that use camera language, but use it vaguely, without anchoring the model to one clear shot.
19- A high-quality 3D computer animation still of a young girl with pigtails, winking and giving a peace sign. The shot is a low-angle, looking up at the girl. She has large, expressive eyes, is smiling with her mouth open, and her cheeks are rosy. Her brown hair is tied into two large pigtails with light blue and pink hair ties. She is wearing a yellow top with a distinct orange slice pattern. She peeks out from a dark, stone-like archway that is covered in vibrant green moss or ivy. The background is a bright blue sky with a softly lit beach or body of water visible in the distance, suggesting a sunny, tropical setting.
21 - A quick, slightly blurry, vertical snapshot taken from inside a car. The image captures two large, white cumulus clouds in the shape of what appear to be two animals: one in the foreground resembles a dog or bear standing on its hind legs, and a second, smaller one behind it looks like another animal or a pile of shapes. Below the clouds, a large, dark urban building with a distinctive pointed roof is visible. The top of a car's windshield and the side of the car frame are visible in the foreground, cutting diagonally across the bottom of the image and adding to the spontaneous feel of the shot. The sky is a clear, bright blue.
The shot of the cloud begins with “A quick, slightly blurry, vertical snapshot taken from inside a car.” The biggest issue here is “vertical snapshot.” It’s vague and depends on context.
This ambiguity forces the model to guess your intent, and Imagen 4 doesn't guess; it follows instructions.
In Techspeak: anchoring a prompt to singular camera grammar with clear visual priors lets Imagen 4 iterate from learned patterns rather than infer intent.
Visual Fidelity — 7.9/10
Imagen 4’s visual quality jumps when the prompt starts with a low-chaos setting. Chaos is costly.
If prompt adherence sets the shot and camera, visual fidelity sets the budget.
Think about how expensive the scene would be to film: cheap-to-shoot settings—studio portraits, product shots, macro photos, single-subject compositions—consistently score highest.
The shot of the Macro Bee, Orange Purse, and the Toys in a Row all score 10 because they keep sharp edges, clear surfaces, and consistent lighting.
They do this by relying on just a few steady elements: shape, texture, and optics. Finally, and most importantly, these elements don't need to interact with each other.
Conversely, fidelity dips whenever prompts exist in worlds that a director would consider “expensive” to shoot in.
The crowd shot blurs and repeats individual figures and poses. The bonfire breaks at flame edges and has inconsistent smoke. The Explosion shot keeps the silhouette but lacks debris and shockwave clarity.
The shot of the ocean holds horizon and scale, but the foam repeats, and the fluid movement of the ocean is inconsistent.
In short, as the chaos of the world you’re building increases, the visual fidelity of the output decreases.
Style & Realism — 7.82/10
If Prompt Adherence is about where to put your camera, and Visual Fidelity is about where to spend your budget, then Style & Realism is about how many departments you have to put on your call sheet.
That’s because in Imagen 4, adding more rule systems to your prompt lowers your Style & Realism score.
Only three images get a perfect 10 for Style & Realism, and they’re aggressively simple.
The close-up of a hand is the benchmark of perfect Style and Realism in Imagen 4. It follows three basic rulesets: gravity, basic lighting/optics, and one fixed material (skin).
No extra rulesets = no additional departments on your call sheet.
The other two shots above both scored 10 for Style & Realism, precisely because they have no real-world physical expectations at all.
The highly stylized domain guarantees consistentencey lighting, anatomy, and materials. In other words, because nothing in the scene is required to behave like the real world, nothing breaks.
12 - A dynamic, action shot of a male athlete with curly hair sprinting intensely on a red running track during a daytime track and field event. He is in the foreground, wearing a red tank top and red running shorts with white stripes and logos, and black compression socks with white running shoes. His face shows exertion, and his body is in full stride. Other runners are visible in the background on adjacent lanes, out of focus, as are white banners or flags typically seen at sporting events. The sunlight is bright and strong, casting clear shadows on the track, emphasizing the speed and energy of the race.
The first drop in Style & Realism occurs when one new rule is added. The shot above, an action shot of a runner, falls to 9 because motion appears.
The rules of gravity and optics still apply, but the model must now obey the rules of human movement.
The result is believable but simplified: the runner is clear, though the motion feels a bit stiff, and secondary movement is softened.
24 - A vertical, dark, and highly atmospheric photograph of a large bonfire burning on a dark ground, likely a beach or field, against a completely black sky. The bonfire consists of a tall stack of logs and branches, with a large, vibrant flame rising from the center. Tiny, glowing embers and sparks are captured flying upwards into the dark abyss above, adding a dynamic sense of movement. The fire's bright orange and yellow light illuminates the surrounding ground, creating warm reflections and distinct shadows on the logs and sand. The overall impression is one of intense heat and a solitary, primal glow in the darkness.
The bonfire shot shows multiple rule systems breaking Style and Realism. You’ve added a pyrotechnics department to your call sheet, and they come to set with a lot of rules.
The model maintains overall lighting, color, and composition but fails in the details. Flames become symbolic and smoke loses texture and gradients. It looks correct at first glance but falls apart on closer inspection.
Do We Recommend Imagen 4 for AI Video Artists?
Yes, with clear caveats.
Imagen 4 is useful for artists who value control, clarity, and predictability…or who are stuck in the Google ecosystem.
It can generate clean plates and excellent product shots excels at clean plates, but there are stronger tools out there at the price point.
How Does Imagen 4 Fast Stack Up Against Other AI Video Tools?
Compared to image generators like Midjourney, Firefly, and Runway’s still modules:
Prompt Adherence: Best-in-class consistency and discipline. Second only to Nana Banana Pro at 9.89 vs 9.72 in our benchmark.
Visual Fidelity: Trails Midjourney in organic detail and natural chaos.
Style & Realism: Most similar to Runway stills with similar scene complexity
Imagen 4 is capable within its comfort zone, but its limited flexibility and conservative style make it less compelling as a standalone tool.
Find the Best AI Tools for Artists and Filmmakers
Check out our full list of AI video generators, image generators, and other AI tools that we recommend.
We give you insight into which tools are best so that you don’t waste your time!
Be sure to check out the page and join our community list if you want to be the first to hear about new AI tools.
